Jaguar S-Type 1999 vs Jaguar XJ 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 285 HP | 300 HP | |
Torque: | 390 NM | 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
Jaguar XJ is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar S-Type engine produces 15 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Jaguar XJ. Due to the lower power, Jaguar S-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 10.9 | |
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar S-Type consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar S-Type could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 85 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
770 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.86 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
Jaguar S-Type is smaller. Jaguar S-Type is 23 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar S-Type is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar S-Type is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Jaguar S-Type can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`195 | 1`900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 9800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar S-Type has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |