Jaguar S-Type 1999 vs Toyota Camry 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar S-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar S-Type engine produces 88 HP more power than Toyota Camry, whereas torque is 82 NM more than Toyota Camry. Thanks to more power Jaguar S-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.6 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Camry is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar S-Type consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar S-Type could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar S-Type consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Camry gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Camry) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar S-Type) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar X-Type, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Previa | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Camry might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Camry 2001 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Jaguar S-Type is larger, but lower. Jaguar S-Type is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Camry, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar S-Type is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar S-Type is 1.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Jaguar S-Type can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`175 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar S-Type has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |