Jaguar S-Type 2002 vs Audi A6 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar S-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar S-Type engine produces 60 HP more power than Audi A6, but torque is 70 NM less than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Jaguar S-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar S-Type consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar S-Type could require 390 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar S-Type consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 510'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar S-Type engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar X-Type, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A8 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar S-Type might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi A6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar S-Type is 8 cm longer than the Audi A6, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar S-Type has 181 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Jaguar S-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar S-Type is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`175 | 2`145 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar S-Type has
|
Audi A6 has
| |