Jaguar S-Type 1999 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Ford Scorpio is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 285 HP | 115 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 390 NM | 167 - 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 - 8.5 seconds | 9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 - 11.9 | 8.3 - 12.6 | |
|
Jaguar S-Type petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
| Jaguar S-Type is 4 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar S-Type is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar S-Type is 1.7 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Jaguar S-Type can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`182 | ~ 1`743 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar S-Type has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |