Jaguar S-Type 1999 vs Volvo S90 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.0 | 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 285 HP | 180 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 390 NM | 260 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 - 8.5 seconds | 9 - 9.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 - 11.9 | 11.0 - 11.7 | |
|
Jaguar S-Type petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Jaguar S-Type is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar S-Type is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar S-Type is 2.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S90, which means Jaguar S-Type can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`182 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar S-Type has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |