Jaguar I-Pace 2018 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | Electric | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 400 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 696 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar I-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar I-Pace engine produces 210 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 296 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Jaguar I-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 23.6 kWh/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 7.10 € | 10.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Electricity€/kWhDiesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.66 m | |
| Jaguar I-Pace and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 656 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1163 litres | 1432 litres | |
| Jaguar I-Pace has 151 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 269 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar I-Pace is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Jaguar I-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`670 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar I-Pace has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |