Jaguar I-Pace 2018 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2018

Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best.	Jaguar I-Pace 2018 - 2023	Skoda Kodiaq 2018 - 2021
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	Electric	2.0 Diesel
Performance
Power:	400 HP	177 HP
Torque:	696 NM	380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	4.8 seconds	8.6 seconds
	Jaguar I-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar I-Pace engine produces 223 HP more power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 316 NM more than Skoda Kodiaq. Thanks to more power Jaguar I-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Consumption:	23.6 kWh/100km
Fuel tank capacity:	90 litres	60 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type
Wheel drive type:	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Dimensions
Length:	4.68 m	4.70 m
Width:	2.01 m	1.88 m
Height:	1.57 m	1.69 m
	Jaguar I-Pace is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Kodiaq, 13 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar I-Pace is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	656 litres	no data
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible	1163 litres	no data
Turning diameter:	12.4 meters	11.6 meters
	The turning circle of the Jaguar I-Pace is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Kodiaq, which means Jaguar I-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight:	2`670 kg	no data

Safety:		no data
Quality:	no data	no data
Average price (€):	19 000	19 800
Pros and Cons:	Jaguar I-Pace has more power more dynamic	Skoda Kodiaq has better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Jaguar I-Pace 2018 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2018

Performance

Fuel consumption

Drive type

Dimensions