Jaguar I-Pace 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | Electric | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 400 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 696 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar I-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar I-Pace engine produces 270 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 376 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Jaguar I-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 23.6 kWh/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 7.10 € | 9.90 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Electricity€/kWhDiesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jaguar I-Pace and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 656 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1163 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Jaguar I-Pace has 106 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 714 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar I-Pace is 1.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Jaguar I-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`670 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`133 kg | 1`590 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 537 kg | 720 kg | |
| Jaguar I-Pace load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 34 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 24 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar I-Pace has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |