Jaguar I-Pace 2018 vs Volvo XC60 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar I-Pace is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC60 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar I-Pace is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC60 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | - (electric) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 - 400 HP | 150 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 - 696 NM | 300 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 6.4 seconds | 5.3 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 2.0 - 7.7 | |
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 216 - 400 mm (8.5 - 15.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.66 m | |
| Jaguar I-Pace and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 656 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1163 litres | 1432 litres | |
| Jaguar I-Pace has 151 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 269 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar I-Pace is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Jaguar I-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`670 | ~ 2`507 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar I-Pace has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |