Jaguar I-Pace 2018 vs Volvo V90 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Jaguar I-Pace is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo V90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar I-Pace is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo V90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | - (electric) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Jaguar I-Pace is available also with electric engines. Electric engines provide instant torque and produce zero tailpipe emissions compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 - 400 HP | 150 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 - 696 NM | 300 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 6.4 seconds | 5 - 10.2 seconds | |
| In general, Jaguar I-Pace are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volvo V90. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 2.0 - 7.4 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 153 mm (6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar I-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.48 m | |
| Jaguar I-Pace is 25 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 12 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar I-Pace is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 656 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1163 litres | 1526 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo V90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V90 (by 363 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar I-Pace is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V90. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`670 kg | ~ 2`376 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`133 kg | ~ 1`937 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 537 kg | ~ 439 kg | |
| Jaguar I-Pace load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Volvo V90. Therefore, Jaguar I-Pace is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo V90 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar I-Pace has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |