Jaguar I-Pace 2018 vs Audi Q5 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar I-Pace is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Audi Q5 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar I-Pace is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi Q5 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi Q5 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | - (electric) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Jaguar I-Pace is available also with electric engines. Electric engines provide instant torque and produce zero tailpipe emissions compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 - 400 HP | 150 - 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 - 696 NM | 320 - 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 6.4 seconds | 5.3 - 9.7 seconds | |
| In general, Jaguar I-Pace are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Audi Q5. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.2 - 7.1 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Jaguar I-Pace is larger, but lower. Jaguar I-Pace is 2 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 12 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar I-Pace is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 656 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1163 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Jaguar I-Pace has 106 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 387 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar I-Pace is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi Q5, which means Jaguar I-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`670 kg | ~ 2`480 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`133 kg | ~ 1`825 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 537 kg | ~ 655 kg | |
| Jaguar I-Pace load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Audi Q5. Therefore, Audi Q5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q5 is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar I-Pace scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar I-Pace has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |