Jaguar F-Type 2013 vs Porsche Cayman 2014
Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 340 HP | 340 HP | |
Torque: | 450 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 4.9 seconds | |
Jaguar F-Type and Porsche Cayman have the same engine power, but Jaguar F-Type torque is 70 NM more than Porsche Cayman. Jaguar F-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.0 | |
The Porsche Cayman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Type consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayman, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Type could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.31 m | 1.28 m | |
Jaguar F-Type is larger. Jaguar F-Type is 7 cm longer than the Porsche Cayman, 12 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 196 litres | 425 litres | |
Porsche Cayman has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar F-Type has 229 litres less trunk space than the Porsche Cayman. This could mean that the Jaguar F-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`665 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 35 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Porsche Cayman has
| |