Jaguar F-Type 2019 vs Audi TT 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Type engine produces 103 HP more power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Audi TT. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar F-Type consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Type could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar F-Type consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar F-Type) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Type is larger, but lower. Jaguar F-Type is 28 cm longer than the Audi TT, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 132 litres | 280 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar F-Type has 148 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. This could mean that the Jaguar F-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 50 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Type has
|
Audi TT has
| |