Jaguar F-Type 2017 vs BMW 4 series 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 400 HP | 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 seconds | 4.9 seconds | |
| Jaguar F-Type engine produces 74 HP more power than BMW 4 series, whereas torque is 10 NM more than BMW 4 series. Despite the higher power, Jaguar F-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.0 | |
|
The BMW 4 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Type consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Type could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 100 mm (3.9 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 4 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar F-Type engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF, Jaguar F-Pace, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 4 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW 4 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2017 3.0 engine: The B58 engine, compared to its predecessor, features a 20% increase in boost pressure, a closed-deck cylinder block design, an increased compression ratio of 11.0:1, and a slightly larger displacement of 2998 cc, up from 2979 cc, with an additional weight of 8 kg. Despite its advancements, the engine has several common ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.39 m | |
| Jaguar F-Type is 16 cm shorter than the BMW 4 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 310 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
408 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Jaguar F-Type has 135 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Type is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW 4 series, which means Jaguar F-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 2`145 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Type has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |