Jaguar F-Type 2013 vs BMW 2 series 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 380 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 4.6 seconds | |
|
BMW 2 series is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar F-Type engine produces 40 HP more power than BMW 2 series, but torque is 40 NM less than BMW 2 series. Despite the higher power, Jaguar F-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.1 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 2 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar F-Type consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Type could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar F-Type consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar F-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 108 mm (4.3 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 2 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar F-Type engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF, Jaguar F-Pace, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 2 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW 2 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Type is larger, but lower. Jaguar F-Type is 2 cm longer than the BMW 2 series, 15 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 196 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 335 litres | |
|
BMW 2 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar F-Type has 84 litres less trunk space than the BMW 2 series. This could mean that the Jaguar F-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Type is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW 2 series, which means Jaguar F-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`025 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 35 800 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Type has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |