Jaguar F-Type 2013 vs BMW 6 series 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Type engine produces 20 HP more power than BMW 6 series, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 6 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar F-Type consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Type could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar F-Type consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 6 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 108 mm (4.3 inches) | 123 mm (4.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 6 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW 6 series version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of BMW 6 series 2011 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF, Jaguar F-Pace, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Type might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW 6 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW 6 sērija 2011 3.0 engine: Using poor quality oil on this engine will quickly lead to soot build-up, resulting in damage to the hydrocompensators, Vanos and Valvetronic systems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.37 m | |
| Jaguar F-Type is 42 cm shorter than the BMW 6 series, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 196 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 350 litres | |
|
BMW 6 series has more luggage space. Jaguar F-Type has 104 litres less trunk space than the BMW 6 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Type is 1.1 metres less than that of the BMW 6 series, which means Jaguar F-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`025 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 800 | 22 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Type has
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |