Jaguar F-Type 2013 vs BMW 4 series 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jaguar F-Type) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW 4 series) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 550 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 680 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.2 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Type engine produces 400 HP more power than BMW 4 series, whereas torque is 360 NM more than BMW 4 series. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 4.1 | |
|
The BMW 4 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Type consumes 7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Type could require 1050 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1580 km on highway | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar F-Type engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XKR, Jaguar XK, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF, Jaguar F-Pace | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Type might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW 4 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.38 m | |
| Jaguar F-Type is 17 cm shorter than the BMW 4 series, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
407 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Jaguar F-Type has 130 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Type is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW 4 series, which means Jaguar F-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 56 800 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Type has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |