Jaguar F-Type 2019 vs Audi TT 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar F-Type is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Audi TT has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar F-Type is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar F-Type also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 - 575 HP | 197 - 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 700 NM | 320 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.7 - 5.7 seconds | 3.9 - 6.9 seconds | |
| In general, Jaguar F-Type are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Audi TT. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 11.0 | 6.3 - 11.1 | |
|
Jaguar F-Type petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Type is larger, but lower. Jaguar F-Type is 28 cm longer than the Audi TT, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 132 litres | 280 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jaguar F-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Type is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi TT. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`079 kg | ~ 1`760 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`682 kg | ~ 1`565 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 397 kg | ~ 195 kg | |
| Jaguar F-Type load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 51 procentiem more than Audi TT. Therefore, Jaguar F-Type is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 50 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Type has
|
Audi TT has
| |