Jaguar F-Type 2017 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Jaguar F-Type is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 2.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 - 550 HP | 238 - 453 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 680 NM | 400 - 617 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.1 - 5.7 seconds | 4.6 - 5.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 11.3 | 8.0 - 12.8 | |
|
Jaguar F-Type petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.34 m | |
| Jaguar F-Type is 30 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 310 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
408 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Type is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`075 | ~ 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Type has
|
| |