Jaguar F-Type 2013 vs Porsche Cayman 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jaguar F-Type
2013 - 2017
Porsche Cayman
2013 - 2016
Body: CabrioCoupe
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Jaguar F-Type is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Porsche Cayman can be equipped only with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 3.0 - 5.02.7 - 3.8

Performance

Power: 340 - 575 HP275 - 385 HP
Torque: 450 - 700 NM280 - 420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 3.7 - 5.7 seconds4.4 - 5.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.1 - 11.37.7 - 10.3
Jaguar F-Type petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Porsche Cayman.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.40 m
Width: 1.92 m1.80 m
Height: 1.31 m1.29 m
Jaguar F-Type is larger.
Jaguar F-Type is 8 cm longer than the Porsche Cayman, 12 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 196 litres425 litres
Porsche Cayman has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Jaguar F-Type has 229 litres less trunk space than the Porsche Cayman. This could mean that the Jaguar F-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Type is 0.3 metres more than that of the Porsche Cayman.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`064~ 1`671
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 35 800no data
Pros and Cons: Jaguar F-Type has
  • available with 4x4 drive
Porsche Cayman has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv