Jaguar F-Type 2013 vs BMW Z4 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Jaguar F-Type is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW Z4 can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 - 575 HP | 156 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 700 NM | 270 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.7 - 5.7 seconds | 5.1 - 8.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 11.3 | 6.8 - 9.4 | |
|
Jaguar F-Type petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW Z4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Type is larger. Jaguar F-Type is 23 cm longer than the BMW Z4, 13 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 196 litres | 180 litres | |
| Jaguar F-Type has 16 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Type is 0.6 metres more than that of the BMW Z4, which means Jaguar F-Type can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`064 | ~ 1`765 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 35 800 | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Type has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |