Jaguar F-Type 2013 vs Kia Cerato 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Jaguar F-Type is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Cerato can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 - 575 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 700 NM | 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.7 - 5.7 seconds | 8.5 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 11.3 | 6.9 - 7.2 | |
|
Jaguar F-Type petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.41 m | |
| Jaguar F-Type is 4 cm shorter than the Kia Cerato, 15 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 433 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
407 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage space. Jaguar F-Type has 25 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`063 | ~ 1`254 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 56 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Type has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |