Jaguar F-Type 2013 vs Ford Mustang 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Jaguar F-Type is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 2.3 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 - 575 HP | 309 - 426 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 700 NM | 407 - 529 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.7 - 5.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 11.3 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.38 m | |
| Jaguar F-Type is 31 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar F-Type is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 408 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
407 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Type is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Jaguar F-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`063 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 56 800 | 28 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Type has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |