Jaguar F-Pace 2020 vs Volvo XC90 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Hybrid | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
| Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo XC90, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 1.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 71 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 223 mm (8.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 619 litres | 262 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1662 litres | 1816 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 154 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`690 kg | 2`950 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`114 kg | 2`222 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 576 kg | 728 kg | |
| Jaguar F-Pace load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem less than Volvo XC90. Therefore, Volvo XC90 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 600 | 44 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |