Jaguar F-Pace 2020 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 300 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 150 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Kadjar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 55 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | no data | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 619 litres | 472 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1662 litres | 1478 litres | |
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar F-Pace has 147 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar F-Pace (by 184 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 1.2 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`690 | 2`139 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 44 400 | 18 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |