Jaguar F-Pace 2020 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 13 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Kadjar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Kadjar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1804 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar F-Pace has 283 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar F-Pace (by 326 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 1.2 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`139 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 44 400 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |