Jaguar F-Pace 2020 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 31 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 71 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 223 mm (8.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jaguar F-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | no data | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1804 litres | 1868 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 64 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`750 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 600 | 44 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |