Jaguar F-Pace 2020 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC60 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo V60, Volvo V40 Cross Country, Volvo S90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC60 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jaguar F-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | no data | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1804 litres | 1432 litres | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar F-Pace has 250 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar F-Pace (by 372 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 000 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |