Jaguar F-Pace 2020 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 74 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1804 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar F-Pace has 205 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 73 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 44 400 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |