Jaguar F-Pace 2020 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 54 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jaguar F-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 128 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1804 litres | 1608 litres | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar F-Pace has 627 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar F-Pace (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 46 800 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |