Jaguar F-Pace 2020 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 96 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Velar, whereas torque is 270 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. Due to the lower power, Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.4 | |
| Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Pace could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 251 mm (9.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Velar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Velar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | no data | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 673 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1804 litres | 1731 litres | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Land Rover Range Rover Velar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar F-Pace (by 73 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`610 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 200 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
| |