Jaguar F-Pace 2017 vs Volvo XC40 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 13 HP more power than Volvo XC40, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo XC40. Despite the higher power, Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 54 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo XC40) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar F-Pace) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Jaguar F-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger. Jaguar F-Pace is 32 cm longer than the Volvo XC40, 21 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar F-Pace has 190 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volvo XC40, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo XC40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 24 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Volvo XC40 has
| |