Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 44 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.3 | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar F-Pace has 155 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 805 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 30 800 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |