Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Volvo XC40 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo XC40, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo XC40. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.0 | |
| Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo XC40) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar F-Pace) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar F-Pace has 190 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC40. The Volvo XC40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo XC40, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo XC40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 24 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Volvo XC40 has
| |