Jaguar F-Pace 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 44 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger, but lower. Jaguar F-Pace is 10 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 18 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Jaguar F-Pace has 155 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 805 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 30 800 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |