Jaguar F-Pace 2017 vs Mercedes GLC 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 10 HP more power than Mercedes GLC, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mercedes GLC. Despite the higher power, Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Jaguar F-Pace version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from twelve 4x4 versions of Jaguar F-Pace 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes GLC might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar F-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2017 2.0 engine Mercedes GLC 2016 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger. Jaguar F-Pace is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes GLC, 18 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Jaguar F-Pace has 150 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLC. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLC (by 750 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes GLC, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |