Jaguar F-Pace 2017 vs Mercedes GLC 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 70 HP more power than Mercedes GLC, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mercedes GLC. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.4 | |
|
The Mercedes GLC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Pace could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes GLC engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes GLC might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes GLC 2016 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger. Jaguar F-Pace is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes GLC, 18 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Jaguar F-Pace has 150 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLC. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLC (by 750 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes GLC, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |