Jaguar F-Pace 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 90 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.1 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Pace could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger. Jaguar F-Pace is 38 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar F-Pace has 75 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 800 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |