Jaguar F-Pace 2017 vs Volvo XC40 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 60 HP more power than Volvo XC40, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Volvo XC40. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.6 | |
|
The Volvo XC40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Pace could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo XC40) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar F-Pace) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger. Jaguar F-Pace is 32 cm longer than the Volvo XC40, 21 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar F-Pace has 190 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volvo XC40, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo XC40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 600 | 24 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Volvo XC40 has
| |