Jaguar F-Pace 2017 vs Mercedes GLC 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 39 HP more power than Mercedes GLC, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mercedes GLC. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Jaguar F-Pace version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from twelve 4x4 versions of Jaguar F-Pace 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes B klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes GLC might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes GLC 2016 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes GLC 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger. Jaguar F-Pace is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes GLC, 18 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Jaguar F-Pace has 150 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLC. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLC (by 750 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes GLC, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |