Jaguar F-Pace 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 10 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar F-Pace engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jaguar F-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger. Jaguar F-Pace is 38 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar F-Pace has 75 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 800 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |