Jaguar F-Pace 2017 vs BMW X5 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jaguar F-Pace) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW X5) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 32 HP more power than BMW X5, but torque is 85 NM less than BMW X5. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Pace could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1330 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar F-Pace engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X5 2013 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car in order to ... More about BMW X5 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.76 m | |
| Jaguar F-Pace is 14 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 13 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1870 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`705 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
BMW X5 has
| |