Jaguar F-Pace 2017 vs Volvo XC40 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 60 HP more power than Volvo XC40, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Volvo XC40. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Pace could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger. Jaguar F-Pace is 32 cm longer than the Volvo XC40, 21 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage capacity. Jaguar F-Pace has 190 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volvo XC40, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo XC40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Volvo XC40 has
| |