Jaguar F-Pace 2017 vs Mercedes GLC 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 89 HP more power than Mercedes GLC, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mercedes GLC. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.3 | |
|
The Mercedes GLC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Pace could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes GLC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes B klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes GLC might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes GLC 2016 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes GLC 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger. Jaguar F-Pace is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes GLC, 18 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1400 litres | |
|
Mercedes GLC has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar F-Pace has 37 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes GLC. This could mean that the Jaguar F-Pace uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLC (by 750 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes GLC, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |