Jaguar F-Pace 2017 vs Audi Q5 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 51 HP more power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Audi Q5. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.1 | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Pace consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar F-Pace could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi Q7, Volkswagen Touareg | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi Q5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger. Jaguar F-Pace is 8 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 18 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1510 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar F-Pace has 87 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. This could mean that the Jaguar F-Pace uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 860 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.6 metres more than that of the Audi Q5, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Jaguar F-Pace scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 26 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |