Jaguar F-Pace 2019 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 3 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar F-Pace 2019 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2019 2.0 engine Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger, but lower. Jaguar F-Pace is 4 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 25 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |