Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Lexus RX 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 380 HP | 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 103 HP more power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 114 NM more than Lexus RX. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.6 | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Pace consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus RX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Lexus RX engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.69 m | |
| Jaguar F-Pace and Lexus RX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.5 metres more than that of the Lexus RX, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Lexus RX has
| |