Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jaguar F-Pace) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volvo XC60) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 4 HP less power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 260 NM more than Volvo XC60. Despite less power, Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar F-Pace consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 705 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar F-Pace consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger, but lower. Jaguar F-Pace is 9 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 18 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Jaguar F-Pace has 13 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 805 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`570 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |