Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Lexus RX 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jaguar F-Pace) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Lexus RX) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 23 HP more power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 354 NM more than Lexus RX. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 10.6 | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Pace consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 690 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus RX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.69 m | |
| Jaguar F-Pace and Lexus RX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.9 metres more than that of the Lexus RX, which means Jaguar F-Pace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`570 | 2`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Lexus RX has
| |