Jaguar F-Pace 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar F-Pace engine produces 36 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Jaguar F-Pace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.7 | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar F-Pace consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jaguar F-Pace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC60 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volvo XC60 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is larger, but lower. Jaguar F-Pace is 9 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 18 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar F-Pace is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
650 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Jaguar F-Pace has 13 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 805 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar F-Pace is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar F-Pace has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |